sketonialings,official

randu,andsostproscuousvarietyoftopics,

historiostallsuch

eeringthe

factthatnyoftheseauthorshaveelseteivetreatisesonspecial

topics,thisproscuityisperhapspardonable.againstsudions,

hooftheliterary

aanyauthors,andtheonlyliteraryaost,andthattheyrepresent

totheese”literature”parexe.aeseschoolboy,incultivatingaprose

style,isdetorepeataseleodels.

furtherhefaendousliterary

aendousnuerofsendously

literaryi.

perhapsodestandardan

elentisalanjoysandsorrohesehere

eerestedin.

butbeingde,odestandard.whenonereads

kueiyukuangsbiographiother,ost

eandleaderofaliteraryvent,ahatthisisthehighestprodueofdevotiontoleaing,andthendisversinitonlya

purelylinguistiraftsnshipinitatingtheas,laidoverapaucityof

ent,onehasarighttobe

disappointed.

goodprosethereisinesealliterature,butoneofinditfor

oneself,haneandardofvaluation.herforliberationofthoughtand

sentintorforliberationofstyle,oneongaclassofslightly

unorthodox,uch

intellectualhattheysthavehadanaturalfortheassofstyle.

suchei,liliweng,

kungtingan,allofellectualrebels,andingsher

bannedreatlydepreeoraheyhadthat

personalstyleofingorofthoughthodoxschardedasfriendlyto

radiorality.

vi.literatureandpolitics

itisnaturalthatthebondageoflanguagehasbroughthitthebohought.

theliterarylanguagehatituldnotexpressathought.it

alidstsueralities,ha

totallaiplineinlogicalreasoning,esescholarsoftendisplayedan

extreent.thisdisparitybethoughtandliterature

broughtaboutasituationhoughtandliteraturewereregar

本章尚未读完,请点击下一页继续阅读---->>>